Post Punk Kitchen Forum

2008 CDC data suggests that approximately 20% of Americans who are infected with HIV do not know they have HIV. That means approximately 80% do.
In 2005, the percentage was about 25%.

The HIV analogy doesn't even seem necessary in this argument. Yes you have to sometimes take vaccines for the team. People who work in hospitals or doctors offices or schools do all the time. That's why they do it, so they won't get sick or make other people who are already compromised get sicker. If you're ever in public, I'd say you're obligated to do that, but me saying you're obligated to do something means as much as you want it to. It's like me saying you're obligated to wash your hands after going to the bathroom. Some people will and some people won't and most people will lie and say they have when they really haven't.

Hey, I don't know if this is addressed to me, but I always wash my hands after using a public bathroom!

Always.

I don't think we even need to invoke the language of duty to talk about this.

I'd settle for something like "It's good to get vaccinations if you don't live on a Saint-Exupéry planet."

There is a similar thread on Mothering.com about vaccines and autism and everyone seems to be clearly anti-vax. So yeah... Also, there is a nice chunk of blaming old mothers for the surge in autism.

eeeek mothering, I read someone who "cured" their childs type 1 diabetes (autoimmune, not lifestyle-my son has it) by eating a paleo diet and everyone was cheering her on. I steer away from there for obvious reasons and I hope that kid really didn't have it or is seeing a real doctor.
have any parents her received boosters lately? I know I haven't and don't know anyone besides my husband who was in the military has. According to this http://www2.cdc.gov/nip/adultImmSched/ I need the mmr, seasonal flu, and Tdap.

Even after their "hero" was found to have falsified his data? Even after they lost in the vaccination courts?

I was researching the chicken pox vaccine recently because I never had the chicken pox as a kid and never received the vaccine as an adult. I had bloodwork done and it showed I have immunity to it. Must have had it without knowing, but anyway, I thought this article was interesting. It's a little old, but apparently the vaccine may not provide lasting immunity. Adults' lack of exposure to kids sick with the chicken pox no longer boosts immunity as it did when the herd wasn't vaccinated.

I think vaccines are important, but I do wonder if the chicken pox vaccine is necessary.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/03/health/03vaccine.html

The mothering.com forums are intensely and willfully divorced from reality, and actively discourage any dissent.

Incidentally, I also don't think that the chicken pox vaccine is particularly useful in early childhood.

mothering.com seems like a parody to me.

same here. except, one unvaccinated child and one on the way.

guys, lets not get off topic again. mothering.com has sections that encourage some behavior that i consider unwise, but the whole forum is not terrible. basically, i don't go there (and never would) for health or medical information, but there are some areas i've found very informative and useful.

anyway, i really like you guys, footface and solipsistnation, but i don't think this topic needs sarcasm.

Here is a new study cited on Mothering.com showing that Hepatitis B Vaccine Triples the Risk of Autism in Infant Boys, in support of not vaccinating. It is from 2009, but it makes interesting points.

I agree that we shouldn't be bashing mothering.com, but I think its interesting that there is such strong support for not vaccinating on an internet group composed of people who are in the process of making these decisions.

I am pretty much sure I'm going to vaccinate our child on schedule, but the Hep B vaccine seems like one I would wait on, given that I don't have Hep B and it is spread through sexual contact and drug use and at least for the first few years of my child's life I hope that won't be an issue. ::knocks wood::

I haven't been sarcastic.

Me neither.

(It's a speech impediment.)

Just to clarify again, I just wanted to make a statement because I don't feel like receiving any sarcastic replies or ones that may seem a bit demeaning simply because people do not agree. If you want to learn what a holistic/naturopathic form of a vaccine is, please research it :)

As far as I can tell from a quick googling, "naturopathic vaccine" is synonymous with "homeopathic nosode". Is that correct?

A quick google tells me that apparently, holistic vaccination involves such things as giving Lathyrus sativus, a legume, in place of the oral polio vaccine.

I did try to research what it meant and I couldn't find anything except stuff about homeopathic nosodes. The (pro-homeopathic) article I read said that homeopathic practitioners were divided on the effectiveness of the "naturopathic vaccines." I am not being sarcastic at all when I say that if you can't convince a believer in homeopathy that there might be something to your treatment, then you are really grasping at straws.

It ought to be illegal to refer to something as a vaccine when it doesn't represent a vaccination in the slightest way. And I'm not a person who throws the term "it ought to be illegal" around frequently.

Yeah, Lathyrus sativus is apparently what homeopaths use to prevent polio--a nosode is a homeopathic preventative.

So I guess a holistic or naturopathic vaccine is a nosode.

Seems like a bad idea to take a preventative that we have no reason to believe does anything at all instead of one that has been shown to be efficacious. I'm also unclear on what kind of principled or religious objection allows for homeopathic preventative but not a conventional one.

A different take on the Hepatitis B vaccine link to autism:

http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2009/10/some_monkey_business_in_autism_research_1.php

It's a long piece, but this was interesting:

Hey, come on. You mentioned holistic/naturopathic vaccines. I asked what they were. And now you're just going to say, "Go look it up if you want to know"?

How fitting: Just got this emailed to me from a friend who knows I'm interested in looking into this stuff. Apparently based on some research presented to the WHO, the CDC is going to reevaluate some of the vaccines and their safety (especially the risks of combining several into one shot)

article with research links attached:
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/artic ... udies.aspx

http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/00_pdf ... Nov-10.pdf

(((giggling)))

i essentially do whatever my pediatrician suggests, unless it involves eating animals or animal byproducts. i trust him and the other qualified peds and ped nps, and ped nurses because they went to medical school to study all of this stuff and want to help me raise healthy kids. i went to art school, and at best can draw a picture of a virus with a thought bubble. i studied the color wheel and degas.

i could not live with myself if one of my children died or was permanently disabled from a disease that could have been prevented, or gave that disease to another child.

I've never read Mothering Magazine. Several times over the years they have done soy scaremongering or anti-vegan articles. I've seen articles from various vegans answering them back. The quality of arguments on both sides has prejudiced me against accepting the views of Mothering Magazine right off the bat.